NYT Columnist
Op-Ed columnists of The New York Times represent a who is who list of American writers: Maureen Dowd, Thomas Friedman Nicholas Kristof, Paul Krugman, Frank Rich, David Brooks and others. The rabid neo-con William Kristol has now joined this A-list as the proverbial fly in the ointment.
The New York Times has announced that Kristol will be writing a weekly column, published every Monday, and he started on Jan. 7. The announcement noted that Kristol was a severe critic of the newspaper but this is the least of his sins. He supported the war on Iraq and continues to support it after it killed a million Iraqis. He is editor of Weekly Standard, the mouthpiece of the neo-cons, and as such the blood of Iraqi women and children, not to mention Palestinian women and children, is on his hands.
I protest vehemently giving Kristol a platform to soil the pages of my favourite English-language newspaper. I have been a reader of the Times for about four decades and my loyalty has withstood the test of the ancient extremist William Sapphire who is now consigned to the dustbin of an On Language column. It will withstand this other William, an even worse variety of the earlier warmonger.
I suppose The New York Times contracted Kristol to show that it is liberal and democratic and open to all shades of opinion. I disagree. It does not need a good conduct certificate from any one, least of all Kristol who will only take away from the credibility of the Op-Ed page just like Charles Krauthammer in The Washington Post..
Kristol would rather forget his first column for the paper. It was miserable and wrong. Writing one day before the New Hampshire vote, Kristol expected Barack Obama to win again and thanked him for removing Hillary Clinton from the path to the White House. He also expected Mike Huckabee to continue his winning run and eventually beat Obama, hence the headline “President Mike Huckabee?” He was wrong, with Clinton returning as the front runner among the Democrats and Senator John McCain reestablishing his lead among Republicans.
I have no objection to Huckabee becoming president. I remember from the sixties the singing nun, Jeanine Decker, so now we may have a singing preacher who also plays the guitar. One thing is certain: Huckabee, or any man succeeding George W. Bush, will be better than his predecessor.
In talking about the Bush administration Kristol could not find any achievements other than the appointments of John Roberts and Samuel Alito to the Supreme Court and victory in Iraq.
Seven years in the White House and just two appointments to show for it? Bush did not want Alito for the job; his first choice was his crony Harriet Miers who turned out to be as unqualified for the Supreme Court as he is for the White House. Alito was only a second choice. And there is absolutely no victory. The resistance and the terrorists are simply biding time, knowing that the Americans will not stay there forever, surge or no surge. The day Kristol produced his first column for the Times, it was publishing a story from Iraq under the headline “U.S. Attack in Iraq Is No surprise to Insurgents” the gist of it being that local fighters in Diyala Province melted away rather than confront the Americans. We have a saying in Arabic with the same meaning as: He who fights and runs away…
So much for Kristol’s scholarship. I turned to Weekly Standard Monday and found a celebration of Clinton’s demise. She proved to be a Lazarus and the neo-con mag was wrong about other things too.
Under the title “They Can’t Handle the Truth” Fred Barnes accused the Democrats of refusing to recognize the success of the surge. My answer is the same as the above to Kristol. The insurgents are still there and innocent Iraqis are being murdered every day by terrorists who came to Iraq after the occupation which is as responsible for their crimes as they are. And there is no democracy. Democracy is not worth its name if the price is a million lives and five million refugees.
Another article was typical neo-con chutzpah by a master of the half truths, Irwin Stelzer. Under the title “Happy New Year” he claims that the American economy is doing well. But the same day Bush was admitting that the American economy was facing challenges and growth must not be taken for granted (read NYT story “Bush Admits Economy Faces Challenges” Jan. 8). Curiouser and curiouser, Stelzer notes that France and Germany are no longer in contest for the anti-American prize, his way of alleging that Bush is gaining friends. In 2007 Bush lost his most vocal allies, the prime ministers of Britain, Italy and Australia, and the twins of Poland, to follow the prime minister of Spain. And I remember reading last month in The Washington Post that the so-called alliance of the willing in Iraq is no more (WP Dec.8 “List of ‘Willing’ U.S. Allies Shrinks Steadily in Iraq.”)
This is the magazine from which The New York Times, in its infinite wisdom, has picked William Kristol, a sick and sickening extremist, to insult its readers with a diatribe every Monday.
Jihad Khazen
The New York Times has announced that Kristol will be writing a weekly column, published every Monday, and he started on Jan. 7. The announcement noted that Kristol was a severe critic of the newspaper but this is the least of his sins. He supported the war on Iraq and continues to support it after it killed a million Iraqis. He is editor of Weekly Standard, the mouthpiece of the neo-cons, and as such the blood of Iraqi women and children, not to mention Palestinian women and children, is on his hands.
I protest vehemently giving Kristol a platform to soil the pages of my favourite English-language newspaper. I have been a reader of the Times for about four decades and my loyalty has withstood the test of the ancient extremist William Sapphire who is now consigned to the dustbin of an On Language column. It will withstand this other William, an even worse variety of the earlier warmonger.
I suppose The New York Times contracted Kristol to show that it is liberal and democratic and open to all shades of opinion. I disagree. It does not need a good conduct certificate from any one, least of all Kristol who will only take away from the credibility of the Op-Ed page just like Charles Krauthammer in The Washington Post..
Kristol would rather forget his first column for the paper. It was miserable and wrong. Writing one day before the New Hampshire vote, Kristol expected Barack Obama to win again and thanked him for removing Hillary Clinton from the path to the White House. He also expected Mike Huckabee to continue his winning run and eventually beat Obama, hence the headline “President Mike Huckabee?” He was wrong, with Clinton returning as the front runner among the Democrats and Senator John McCain reestablishing his lead among Republicans.
I have no objection to Huckabee becoming president. I remember from the sixties the singing nun, Jeanine Decker, so now we may have a singing preacher who also plays the guitar. One thing is certain: Huckabee, or any man succeeding George W. Bush, will be better than his predecessor.
In talking about the Bush administration Kristol could not find any achievements other than the appointments of John Roberts and Samuel Alito to the Supreme Court and victory in Iraq.
Seven years in the White House and just two appointments to show for it? Bush did not want Alito for the job; his first choice was his crony Harriet Miers who turned out to be as unqualified for the Supreme Court as he is for the White House. Alito was only a second choice. And there is absolutely no victory. The resistance and the terrorists are simply biding time, knowing that the Americans will not stay there forever, surge or no surge. The day Kristol produced his first column for the Times, it was publishing a story from Iraq under the headline “U.S. Attack in Iraq Is No surprise to Insurgents” the gist of it being that local fighters in Diyala Province melted away rather than confront the Americans. We have a saying in Arabic with the same meaning as: He who fights and runs away…
So much for Kristol’s scholarship. I turned to Weekly Standard Monday and found a celebration of Clinton’s demise. She proved to be a Lazarus and the neo-con mag was wrong about other things too.
Under the title “They Can’t Handle the Truth” Fred Barnes accused the Democrats of refusing to recognize the success of the surge. My answer is the same as the above to Kristol. The insurgents are still there and innocent Iraqis are being murdered every day by terrorists who came to Iraq after the occupation which is as responsible for their crimes as they are. And there is no democracy. Democracy is not worth its name if the price is a million lives and five million refugees.
Another article was typical neo-con chutzpah by a master of the half truths, Irwin Stelzer. Under the title “Happy New Year” he claims that the American economy is doing well. But the same day Bush was admitting that the American economy was facing challenges and growth must not be taken for granted (read NYT story “Bush Admits Economy Faces Challenges” Jan. 8). Curiouser and curiouser, Stelzer notes that France and Germany are no longer in contest for the anti-American prize, his way of alleging that Bush is gaining friends. In 2007 Bush lost his most vocal allies, the prime ministers of Britain, Italy and Australia, and the twins of Poland, to follow the prime minister of Spain. And I remember reading last month in The Washington Post that the so-called alliance of the willing in Iraq is no more (WP Dec.8 “List of ‘Willing’ U.S. Allies Shrinks Steadily in Iraq.”)
This is the magazine from which The New York Times, in its infinite wisdom, has picked William Kristol, a sick and sickening extremist, to insult its readers with a diatribe every Monday.
Jihad Khazen
posted by Khazen at 5:04 AM
3 comments
